80 years later, we still talk about Hitler and the Nazis. Yet people want to forget these massive crimes against humanity five years out. NO!!! We must beat this drum for decades and decades to remind future generations of what happened here and invoke the same phrase “never again“
From the beginning, the data didn’t make any sense. We were meant to believe that in the trial period, at the height of the pandemic, there were only 170 cases of Covid out of roughly 44,000 people? Also, the pre test probability of the vaccine ever working was extremely low. The UK government spent millions over 44 years trying to find an effective vaccine against corona and rhino viruses, then walked away. Yet we were expected to believe that Pfizer pulled it off in 6 months?😂
Thank you for your digging. This lays it all out for everyone to see. It should open some of the eyes that have been shut too long. Now that Dr. Fauci has been exposed it should be easier for other malfeasances to come out. All the best with your efforts, the world needs more people like you. The Government of Canada claimed that Health Canada had studied the vaccine extensively and claimed it was safe and effective. I wonder what data they were analyzing?
I wanted to share a quick thought after reading your post.
For me, the issue isn’t just about safety or how well something works. It’s about trust. Real trust: the kind that only comes from being willing to go back, check the work, and fix whatever wasn’t done right the first time.
When a trial has gaps, missing data, or unanswered questions, the fastest way to rebuild confidence is to redo the parts that weren’t solid. Not because the science can’t stand on its own, but because people deserve a process that’s transparent, repeatable, and accountable.
We spend money on far more frivolous things every single day. If there was ever a moment where the time and expense were justified, it’s when the outcome affects millions of people and the public’s trust in the entire system.
A clean, transparent redo or at the very least a full independent audit would go a long way toward restoring that trust.
nothing to see here! known this for years, but it’s nice to see it spelled out again. I would like to add that as I’m assuming you are aware neither is there such a thing as a virus that’s ever been scientifically isolated, shown to cause disease and or to be contagious. Therefore, in my opinion, there is no such thing as a vaccine aside from the fact that the PCR cannot distinguish between something that causes disease and does not cause disease and is not a test until Christian Drosten made it into a test. covid obviously is not a thing and only exists in the computer program and has never been isolated in the real human being. That’s why I haven’t really read any studies on the statistical chicanery of vaccine manufacturers as well as governments because that’s existed for a very long time in all areas of life. most companies are insincere. But other than that, great research. “What else is new?“ thank you!
I have studied virology for approximately 5000 hours. It is a total Hollywood BS story pseudoscience and a scam. That is the biggest distinction here. People are being distracted by origin stories or lab leaks and do not understand virology. This is not a stretch. this IS the crux of this whole situation. viruses do not exist as they have been presented to us.
TBH, people should have know it was sus when Pfizer’s data indicated 1 died of the “only 8” in the treatment arm of the trial caught [PCR-confirmed] COVID whereas only 2 died of the 162 that got COVID in the placebo. Unless the vaccine itself increased the CFR/IFR, how could that be? SMDH
80 years later, we still talk about Hitler and the Nazis. Yet people want to forget these massive crimes against humanity five years out. NO!!! We must beat this drum for decades and decades to remind future generations of what happened here and invoke the same phrase “never again“
I had forgotten all about that UK data! At the time, I was following it weekly, then it got pulled. "People might get the wrong idea"... uh huh.
From the beginning, the data didn’t make any sense. We were meant to believe that in the trial period, at the height of the pandemic, there were only 170 cases of Covid out of roughly 44,000 people? Also, the pre test probability of the vaccine ever working was extremely low. The UK government spent millions over 44 years trying to find an effective vaccine against corona and rhino viruses, then walked away. Yet we were expected to believe that Pfizer pulled it off in 6 months?😂
Thank you for your digging. This lays it all out for everyone to see. It should open some of the eyes that have been shut too long. Now that Dr. Fauci has been exposed it should be easier for other malfeasances to come out. All the best with your efforts, the world needs more people like you. The Government of Canada claimed that Health Canada had studied the vaccine extensively and claimed it was safe and effective. I wonder what data they were analyzing?
I wanted to share a quick thought after reading your post.
For me, the issue isn’t just about safety or how well something works. It’s about trust. Real trust: the kind that only comes from being willing to go back, check the work, and fix whatever wasn’t done right the first time.
When a trial has gaps, missing data, or unanswered questions, the fastest way to rebuild confidence is to redo the parts that weren’t solid. Not because the science can’t stand on its own, but because people deserve a process that’s transparent, repeatable, and accountable.
We spend money on far more frivolous things every single day. If there was ever a moment where the time and expense were justified, it’s when the outcome affects millions of people and the public’s trust in the entire system.
A clean, transparent redo or at the very least a full independent audit would go a long way toward restoring that trust.
Thanks for raising the topic.
It’s an important one.
nothing to see here! known this for years, but it’s nice to see it spelled out again. I would like to add that as I’m assuming you are aware neither is there such a thing as a virus that’s ever been scientifically isolated, shown to cause disease and or to be contagious. Therefore, in my opinion, there is no such thing as a vaccine aside from the fact that the PCR cannot distinguish between something that causes disease and does not cause disease and is not a test until Christian Drosten made it into a test. covid obviously is not a thing and only exists in the computer program and has never been isolated in the real human being. That’s why I haven’t really read any studies on the statistical chicanery of vaccine manufacturers as well as governments because that’s existed for a very long time in all areas of life. most companies are insincere. But other than that, great research. “What else is new?“ thank you!
I like Phil's tool. great use of AI. but you are stretching to claim no such thing as a virus.
I have studied virology for approximately 5000 hours. It is a total Hollywood BS story pseudoscience and a scam. That is the biggest distinction here. People are being distracted by origin stories or lab leaks and do not understand virology. This is not a stretch. this IS the crux of this whole situation. viruses do not exist as they have been presented to us.
to my knowledge, none of the missing data ever came out in the Pfizer forced data dumps. Am I wrong?
TBH, people should have know it was sus when Pfizer’s data indicated 1 died of the “only 8” in the treatment arm of the trial caught [PCR-confirmed] COVID whereas only 2 died of the 162 that got COVID in the placebo. Unless the vaccine itself increased the CFR/IFR, how could that be? SMDH
I think concerns will be similar for the HIV trials and studies since Fauci was involved in both.
Great job with this, so clear. Peter doshi was doing some great reporting on it at the time.