I would recommend William Supple Jr PhD book Cancer is a Parasite . He also has a Substack . The combination of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole works wonders against Cancer. Lots of anecdotal case studies , too !
Actually I came across an article/video that was talking about this subject, PARASITES & WORMS and it was discovered that in the late 1800's and 1900' years, many books were written about them, at least a full chapter in their medical books.
Let those who wait for the trials, let them wait. Let those who take ivermectin for cancer, bravo to them. It is working. Big Pharma fears anything that takes their profits. They want you sick and dependent on them only. You cannot think for yourself. They must think for you.
We need doctors, and we need medicine. But there is a fine line where you think for yourself, or you don't.
Thanks for this. I'll go through it in more detail when I can, but a couple immediate things. First, thank you for providing an angle that is less commonly addressed: "you're telling me that a viable candidate for x disease is cheap and available and the medical industry isn't using it? yes, that's what i'm telling you." That's a pattern so typical, I rarely write on it, but if more people are to learn what they don't know on this topic, this sort of bridge may help so thank you for speaking to it. Second, I see you did the "This is not medical advice" line that is the typical statement to avoid being a target of industry attacks. I just wanted to note that you added "talk to your oncologist." If you feel it's safest for you to make such a statement, perhaps you'd consider "talk to a trusted health care provider". Maybe that change will make zero difference in the real world, but I personally would never recommend oncology, for example, as oncologists are trained to use drugs, not solutions. But I would always recommend a good care provider who might have the title of naturopath, for example. Or it could be an MD or functional doc or even a nutritionist - anyone can be successful with cancer but oncologist training does not result in successful treatment so I for one would never recommend them. Here's an organized portal to research and references and I'll be sure to add your material as soon as I can:
Great article. There’s Dr William Makis a Canadian oncologist who to date has treated 9000 late stage human cancer patients with a combination of ivermectin and fenbendazole/ membendazole and supplements. He posts anonymous scans of his patients which show significant tumour reduction and complete clearance . These patient numbers are not trivial they are enough for a clinical trial. Dr Makis has been persecuted by the Canadian government but he is moving to Florida where he is opening a cancer clinic. He is fully supported by the Governor of Florida and by the Surgeon General.
My stepdaughter is using Ivermectin/Fendbendazole with stage 4 breast cancer, also prescribed cannabis for pain relief. Oncologists won't go near her - she's been referred to 2, so far, but has not been see by either. The mainstream medical profession doesn't want to know. Her mother died of pancreatic cancer 2 yrs ago, early diagnoses, after 32 bouts of chemo and a program of radiation that, while it kept the tumour from enlarging or metastisizing, ravaged her body to the extent it just ceased working and internally collapsed with internal hemorraghing! Perhaps the Ivermectin could have done something useful for her!
I think you should find the time necessary to listen to this video. It is quite interesting in how Samuel Shepherd did the research to cure his own cancer. The website has testimonials that various users have left. He tells how to do your own research at NIH. He has patented the product ValAsta.
In this episode of Over 40 Fitness Hacks, the interviewer sits down with Samuel Shepherd—a biochemical engineer with a wild backstory spanning petrochemicals, defense research, and cutting-edge science—to discuss his personal journey from a terminal diagnosis to discovering the potential of astaxanthin. Samuel shares how he was diagnosed with polycythemia vera, a rare and life-threatening blood cancer, and given slim odds of survival. After years of traditional management with no real solution, he took matters into his own hands—leveraging his background in chemistry and access to advanced research tools to search for answers. His breakthrough came from a simple but powerful question: “What living things don’t get cancer?” After researching species like salmon, flamingos, sharks, elephants, and naked mole rats, he identified a common compound among them—astaxanthin, a potent antioxidant derived from algae. He began experimenting on himself, initially consuming algae-derived astaxanthin in small doses. Over time, he observed measurable improvements in his condition—eventually eliminating the need for ongoing blood treatments. They break down the science in a way that makes sense for everyday listeners: Aging & disease are heavily linked to free radical damage These free radicals contribute to inflammation, DNA damage, and chronic disease As we age (around 40–50), our natural antioxidant production declines. Samuel explains that astaxanthin works differently than typical antioxidants: It targets multiple free radicals at once. It operates at the mitochondrial level (your body’s energy center) It may help reduce the root causes of inflammation rather than just symptoms. He also introduces his concept of attacking disease at the “trunk of the tree” (root cause), rather than treating individual symptoms at the “branches.” A key part of Samuel’s work is improving how astaxanthin is absorbed: Standard supplements often isolate the compound. He discovered that keeping it bound to a glucose molecule improves absorption. This “Trojan horse” concept may help deliver it more effectively into cells.
Good luck going forward with your daughter. The body can heal itself if we can find out what it needs to do the repairs.
In this link, in late 1980's, a doctor recalls a private conference he attended, in 1969, where Dr Day relayed what the future will be. He mentions drugs, free love, kids rebelling, abortion, normalising homosexuality, IDs, etc. He also pointed out that Rockerfeller had cures for mostt cancers locked away, however, some researchers may find these cures independently. He said because of the population explosion, the numbers would have to be controlled and so the cure wouldn't be made known. People will die and no big deal if they die of cancer. thewhiterose.uk/the-1968-day-tapes-a-blueprint-for-slavery/ Can't easily edit so to say it was 1968, not 69. The research for cures or treatments is funded by pharma and, as this article clearly states, the researcher's hands are tied to what they are permitted to research. The Unis and anyone else won't bite the hand that feeds them and, too, I suspect the search for "the cure", if found, would make them redundant so they go along, to get along.
They will never run trials on this. It costs money to do that and there is no money to be made from ivermectin. The only hope is for poor countries to try it, and their results will be ignored.
The article makes a fair point: there is a long list of preclinical studies showing ivermectin has anti‑cancer activity, but there are zero large‑scale clinical trials. The author isn’t claiming it works — only that the lack of trials is an incentives problem, not a scientific one.
Excellent piece, thank you. Particularly liked: “This is not necessarily a conspiracy. It is simply what happens when profit is the dominant incentive.” and “what we are allowed to ‘know’ in medicine is shaped by a highly filtered corpus of knowledge - one optimised for patentability and profitability as much as for truth. The quiet revolution begins when ordinary people reclaim the right to ask simple, dangerous questions”, which will borrow and use when appropriate as so simply and truthfully put.
I would recommend William Supple Jr PhD book Cancer is a Parasite . He also has a Substack . The combination of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole works wonders against Cancer. Lots of anecdotal case studies , too !
Actually I came across an article/video that was talking about this subject, PARASITES & WORMS and it was discovered that in the late 1800's and 1900' years, many books were written about them, at least a full chapter in their medical books.
Let those who wait for the trials, let them wait. Let those who take ivermectin for cancer, bravo to them. It is working. Big Pharma fears anything that takes their profits. They want you sick and dependent on them only. You cannot think for yourself. They must think for you.
We need doctors, and we need medicine. But there is a fine line where you think for yourself, or you don't.
We need less avarice and more integrity from the medical fraternity.
Thanks for this. I'll go through it in more detail when I can, but a couple immediate things. First, thank you for providing an angle that is less commonly addressed: "you're telling me that a viable candidate for x disease is cheap and available and the medical industry isn't using it? yes, that's what i'm telling you." That's a pattern so typical, I rarely write on it, but if more people are to learn what they don't know on this topic, this sort of bridge may help so thank you for speaking to it. Second, I see you did the "This is not medical advice" line that is the typical statement to avoid being a target of industry attacks. I just wanted to note that you added "talk to your oncologist." If you feel it's safest for you to make such a statement, perhaps you'd consider "talk to a trusted health care provider". Maybe that change will make zero difference in the real world, but I personally would never recommend oncology, for example, as oncologists are trained to use drugs, not solutions. But I would always recommend a good care provider who might have the title of naturopath, for example. Or it could be an MD or functional doc or even a nutritionist - anyone can be successful with cancer but oncologist training does not result in successful treatment so I for one would never recommend them. Here's an organized portal to research and references and I'll be sure to add your material as soon as I can:
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/free-reference-portal-to-all-things
Great article. There’s Dr William Makis a Canadian oncologist who to date has treated 9000 late stage human cancer patients with a combination of ivermectin and fenbendazole/ membendazole and supplements. He posts anonymous scans of his patients which show significant tumour reduction and complete clearance . These patient numbers are not trivial they are enough for a clinical trial. Dr Makis has been persecuted by the Canadian government but he is moving to Florida where he is opening a cancer clinic. He is fully supported by the Governor of Florida and by the Surgeon General.
My stepdaughter is using Ivermectin/Fendbendazole with stage 4 breast cancer, also prescribed cannabis for pain relief. Oncologists won't go near her - she's been referred to 2, so far, but has not been see by either. The mainstream medical profession doesn't want to know. Her mother died of pancreatic cancer 2 yrs ago, early diagnoses, after 32 bouts of chemo and a program of radiation that, while it kept the tumour from enlarging or metastisizing, ravaged her body to the extent it just ceased working and internally collapsed with internal hemorraghing! Perhaps the Ivermectin could have done something useful for her!
I think you should find the time necessary to listen to this video. It is quite interesting in how Samuel Shepherd did the research to cure his own cancer. The website has testimonials that various users have left. He tells how to do your own research at NIH. He has patented the product ValAsta.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwL-nq01qT8
www.ValAsta.com
In this episode of Over 40 Fitness Hacks, the interviewer sits down with Samuel Shepherd—a biochemical engineer with a wild backstory spanning petrochemicals, defense research, and cutting-edge science—to discuss his personal journey from a terminal diagnosis to discovering the potential of astaxanthin. Samuel shares how he was diagnosed with polycythemia vera, a rare and life-threatening blood cancer, and given slim odds of survival. After years of traditional management with no real solution, he took matters into his own hands—leveraging his background in chemistry and access to advanced research tools to search for answers. His breakthrough came from a simple but powerful question: “What living things don’t get cancer?” After researching species like salmon, flamingos, sharks, elephants, and naked mole rats, he identified a common compound among them—astaxanthin, a potent antioxidant derived from algae. He began experimenting on himself, initially consuming algae-derived astaxanthin in small doses. Over time, he observed measurable improvements in his condition—eventually eliminating the need for ongoing blood treatments. They break down the science in a way that makes sense for everyday listeners: Aging & disease are heavily linked to free radical damage These free radicals contribute to inflammation, DNA damage, and chronic disease As we age (around 40–50), our natural antioxidant production declines. Samuel explains that astaxanthin works differently than typical antioxidants: It targets multiple free radicals at once. It operates at the mitochondrial level (your body’s energy center) It may help reduce the root causes of inflammation rather than just symptoms. He also introduces his concept of attacking disease at the “trunk of the tree” (root cause), rather than treating individual symptoms at the “branches.” A key part of Samuel’s work is improving how astaxanthin is absorbed: Standard supplements often isolate the compound. He discovered that keeping it bound to a glucose molecule improves absorption. This “Trojan horse” concept may help deliver it more effectively into cells.
Good luck going forward with your daughter. The body can heal itself if we can find out what it needs to do the repairs.
great read
This is such a great article- thank you.
In this link, in late 1980's, a doctor recalls a private conference he attended, in 1969, where Dr Day relayed what the future will be. He mentions drugs, free love, kids rebelling, abortion, normalising homosexuality, IDs, etc. He also pointed out that Rockerfeller had cures for mostt cancers locked away, however, some researchers may find these cures independently. He said because of the population explosion, the numbers would have to be controlled and so the cure wouldn't be made known. People will die and no big deal if they die of cancer. thewhiterose.uk/the-1968-day-tapes-a-blueprint-for-slavery/ Can't easily edit so to say it was 1968, not 69. The research for cures or treatments is funded by pharma and, as this article clearly states, the researcher's hands are tied to what they are permitted to research. The Unis and anyone else won't bite the hand that feeds them and, too, I suspect the search for "the cure", if found, would make them redundant so they go along, to get along.
Well yes, Ivermectin may help fight cancer and it’s also been peer-reviewed now. When i had cancer, i took ivermectin for months and now i am cured.
You can also order ivermectin capsules online and over-the-counter as well from Medicine Counter Pharmacy where prescription is included.
They have compounded it in US and have licensed MDs working on their telehealth platform to approve prescription.
They will never run trials on this. It costs money to do that and there is no money to be made from ivermectin. The only hope is for poor countries to try it, and their results will be ignored.
The article makes a fair point: there is a long list of preclinical studies showing ivermectin has anti‑cancer activity, but there are zero large‑scale clinical trials. The author isn’t claiming it works — only that the lack of trials is an incentives problem, not a scientific one.
Excellent piece, thank you. Particularly liked: “This is not necessarily a conspiracy. It is simply what happens when profit is the dominant incentive.” and “what we are allowed to ‘know’ in medicine is shaped by a highly filtered corpus of knowledge - one optimised for patentability and profitability as much as for truth. The quiet revolution begins when ordinary people reclaim the right to ask simple, dangerous questions”, which will borrow and use when appropriate as so simply and truthfully put.
Why so much WILLFUL ignorance? It pays well! - Why should we expect them to understand any of this? They are paid above-market wages not to understand it. - http://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2025/08/seeking-reality-while-navigating-sea-of.html
https://youtu.be/cM1t5BdptT4?is=7uClXAvS9KV6EfAG
yes people had said this
I totally agree with your article. Could you post the actual studies ?
All those studies are already linked. The summary title itself is a link
More evidence here: https://makisw.substack.com/p/highwire-del-bigtree-article-they?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1385328&post_id=197797879&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=njbfo&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Got it. Thank you